Read Archive Issues Vol.7 No.4 November 2006 Vol.8 No.1 December 2006 Vol.8 No.2 January 2007 Vol.8 No.3 February 2007 Vol.8 No.4 March 2007 Vol.9 No.1 April 2007 Vol.9 No.2 May 2007 Vol.9 No.3 June 2007 Vol.9 No.4 July 2007 Vol.10 No.1 August 2007 Vol.10 No.2 September 2007 Vol.10 No.3 October 2007 Vol.10 No.4 November 2007

We are proud to introduce Wi-ZOOOM Lite, a new series of Wireless Internet Service targeted especially for those users who are located away from the main city area with no proper telephone line or other options for connectivity available.

This service is currently available in the 5 packages. Which one is right for you?

  Maintained By

The A-list

1. Ta-da List

2. PBwiki

3. Google Docs

4. Bloglines v3 beta

5. Zoho Creator

Honorable mention

> Basecamp

> Google Calendar

> Carbonit

Ta-da List

Any application has to balance the urge to offer lots of functionality with the need for an easy-to-use interface. But that's especially true for Web-based apps, where software bloat can be especially annoying because of slow connections and server wait times, and where users expect to point and click without having to read a 100-page manual first.

You'd be hard pressed to find a more streamlined, simple service than Ta-da List, which bills itself as "the Web's easiest to-do list tool." After opening an account, click "create a new list," name it, type in a task and click "add this item." Add more items by typing them in. Order the items by clicking on "reorder" and dragging items up or down.

Done rearranging? Click "I'm done reordering." When a task is completed, click the box next to it to move it down to the bottom. Edit or delete items (or the list itself) by selecting the edit link.

That's pretty much it. There are no categories, no tags, no priority numbers. Typically, it's used when we've got a couple of different things in the works that we want to make sure we remember. It's simple, elegant and very quick -- easy enough to replace jotting down a list on a piece of paper, but with a cool AJAX interface.

And unlike a paper list, our Ta-da list is available anywhere we can get online; we can't misplace it. We can also share it with others, either for viewing only or as a group collaborative list. While there are Google ads on the site, they're fairly innocuous and don't feel intrusive while you're using your list.

Ta-da List was created by 37signals, the company best known for the Basecamp project management service that spawned David Heinemeier Hansson's open-source "Ruby on Rails" project. Hansson is adamant about keeping all his software lean, and nowhere is that more true than Ta-da List.

Besides giving us the Web's most famous encyclopedia, wikis offer a handy tool for many other types of informal group collaboration. A lot of open-source projects use wikis to share technical information with their users as well as among developers. While there are plenty of free wiki software packages you can download and install, in-house installation also means in-house update, patching and support.

Initially recommended to our editorial team by one of our Web developers, PBwiki has turned out to be a useful tool to share information and advice about stories in the works and future story ideas. The site claims you can "use PBwiki to make a free wiki as easily as a peanut butter sandwich," and that's pretty much accurate. And once the wiki is set up, adding pages or text to it is quicker and easier than logging into a more structured format.

PBwiki offers ad-supported free wikis as well as paid, ad-free accounts. Wikis can be public or private/shared. You can add widgets (such as basic spreadsheets, chat, Google maps or videos), with additional functionality for paid accounts. All accounts can see revision updates and changes on the site and track changes via e-mail notification. Business accounts also offer different levels of access per user, the ability to make certain pages read-only and page-level RSS feeds.

Of course, there are drawbacks to free-form data as opposed to more structured formats; you can't really query or sort a text blob. There is a basic search box in a PBwiki, but searching for "Machlis" across many wiki pages can't give you the same targeted results as, say, querying a database for "all stories by author Machlis in the last three months."

Still, if you don't expect a wiki to do the job of a spreadsheet or a database, PBwiki can be a useful addition to your information management arsenal.

Google threatens to become the ubiquitous do-exactly-that Web empire, amassing too much information about individuals and too much power over what was supposed to be an egalitarian medium. Do we really want Google taking over our most-used applications, too? Perhaps not, but we can't help but like Google Docs.

Google Docs offers an easy way to work on documents at home, at the office and elsewhere, without having to e-mail files around. We can keep some simple documents in Google Docs and download backups to our own PC. When we want the power-user functions of Word or Excel, we can work in those packages, upload the file to Google Docs and then download again to our next system before starting to work again. It's a version control system for documents and spreadsheets.

If you don't need slick formatting, headers and scripts; basic writing, HTML coding and spell-check works just fine. However, when it comes time to turn it in, you'll be downloading it to your own system, saving it as a Word doc. However, we must admit Word's "track changes" function is more elegant than Google Doc's "compare revisions." Still, compare revisions is a nice function to have, along with some formatting, quick-link additions and sharing.

Google's spreadsheet definitely isn't powerful enough for some projects. However, it's fine for moderate strength tracking needs and superior when we want multiple users adding fairly simple data to a sheet. It's baffling that Microsoft hasn't jumped into the business of offering a Web platform for easily sharing Excel documents, although others such as eXpresso Corp. are trying to get into that business.

Meanwhile, we're finding Google Docs a nice backup and version-control server for important and useful but not terribly private or sensitive documents.

There are loads of RSS readers out there, including worthy entries like NewsGator and Google Reader, as well as some with Web 2.0 interfaces on steroids, such as Pageflakes.

But over the years, we kept returning to Bloglines, despite its aging Web 1.0 interface, because it did what we wanted done with a minimum of fuss. Finally, though, the new Bloglines v3 beta offers an updated UI with a start page and some drag-and-drop ordering that brings the RSS service into the modern era.

Our goal in reading RSS feeds isn't to recreate a full, rich-media Web experience. If we wanted that, we'd be surfing directly to source sites. Instead, we want to scan headlines and summaries. We don't want to play around with a lot of buttons, links and options; We're looking for information.

We want simple ways to subscribe to feeds and see what's new, with some basic feed organization tools. We want to be able to import and export OPML (a way to save a collection of feed subscriptions). And being able to "clip" and save individual stories is nice.

The beta was pretty limited earlier, without even a way to mark posts as still unread (that's since been addressed with a "pin" function). We're still awaiting the "clippings" (keep and save some items) and "publish" (mark items to put in a new RSS feed you can make public) options, but the Bloglines beta help pages assure such functions are on the way.

The start page shows you summaries of headlines when you hover over the item, an AJAX standard that's just coming to Bloglines, and lets you easily add, delete and rearrange components. 

The only major annoyance so far is that when you click on links from your start page, you just get a Bloglines summary pop-up instead of going to the source site; for that, you've got to move your mouse over to the pop-up window and click a second time. You'd prefer a summary when hovering but a link when you click.

Overall, though, it's looking like the Bloglines update will refresh but not mess with the basic functionalities that have won the service a place near the top of our browser bookmarks.

Unlike word processors or wikis, we haven't seen a flood of free Web sites for building database-driven applications. The few other database entries we'd tried were generally either limited, expensive or cumbersome. But not Zoho Creator.

Zoho Creator sports a surprisingly easy interface for creating your own apps -- even those that include some table joins (that is, looking up information in one table for use in another, which helps put the "relational" in relational databases). With a few drag-and-drops, we quickly created data entry forms with text fields, drop-down lists, text boxes and so on.

Our test applications ranged from simple (tracking charitable contributions) to complex (story tracking by writer, editor and status), and all ended up doing pretty much what we wanted.

You can see the live interactive database below. Sort by any of the available columns by clicking on the column header (clicking the same header toggles between ascending and descending sort). Click on the search box, and you'll see options to search by product name as well as headline and date.

There's a drag-and-drop option for adding a "lookup" field that pulls selections from another table. It's likewise fairly easy to set up different views of your data, and user-by-user access to each view and form. Creator also offers drag-and-drop scripting, allowing such things as setting defaults or variables based on certain conditions, sending out autogenerated e-mails when a field is changed in a specific way, or validating user input.

For more sophisticated scripting, it's easy to click back and forth between drag-and-drop scripting and the actual code. And we quickly downloaded data from Zoho Creator onto our own system for backup in varying formats, such as comma-separated or XLS spreadsheet format (although, alas, not in SQL) -- a must for any Web-based application where we're storing important data.

We can think of many real-world uses for Creator, from detailed story tracking in our rooms to keeping the list of who's slated to buy Friday morning breakfast (making it simple to see who hasn't bought their share and even set up automated e-mail notifications when the list is changed). If you're a fan of structured data on the Web, both available to the public at large and shared with a select list of friends or colleagues, Zoho Creator is definitely worth a look.

Be aware that if you're a true database geek, Zoho Creator isn't a replacement for coding your own database app with something like PHP, Python or Ruby, and MySQL or PostgreSQL. Page layouts are limited (there are two, with no style customizations), and you can't do everything with variables, conditional scripting or sophisticated table joins that you can when coding from scratch.

You can embed Zoho Creator applications in your own Web pages, although if you decide to use the apps at Zoho.com, you can't do things such as redirect users to a specific view after they've filled out a form. (They just get a message saying data was successfully submitted, followed by a new blank form.)

We find it occasionally frustrating that Zoho Creator uses its own scripting language, Deluge, requiring yet another new syntax to learn if I want to build functionality that goes beyond drag-and-drop offerings. For example, while it's easy to set up autogenerated mail to a specific hard-coded e-mail address, it took us several hours of poking around and document reading to figure out how to do so based on varying conditions. There's some documentation on Deluge at zoho.com but not too many other places to turn. (Note: Power users might want to check out a blog started recently by several Zoho Creator users, Land of ZC.)

And while most of the application is intuitive, some things are not, such as how to store a "collection" of records and even how to edit existing records (a puzzle shared by several of my colleagues, although easy to use once we found it -- a barely noticeable pencil icon next to records in a view).

Fortunately, though, the Zoho staff is quite responsive about answering questions, even from customers with free accounts. Some of the written responses can be a bit difficult to understand, but they're generally useful. In one case, someone even built me a sample application to demonstrate how to conditionally pull data from one table into another.

Zoho.com has a slew of other offerings, including word processing, spreadsheets, wikis, project management, "notebooks" and Web conferencing, although so far we've stuck with Creator. Many of the other apps, including the Google Docs competitors Zoho Writer and Zoho Sheet, are quite feature-packed, but too much at the expense of elegant UI for our tastes.

Earlier this month, Zoho announced a private beta of Zoho Business, a pay service that will include a companywide administrative console, telephone support and "co-branding." For now, most of the services are free, and the plan is to keep them so for individual use. We expect we'll be building some real apps on the site soon.

Honorable mention

37signals LLC's Basecamp project management tool is a slick application.

Basecamp combines collaboration with project-tracking tools such as to-do lists, milestones and writeboards (private wikis with comments). It definitely keeps to the Rails philosophy that favors elegance over feature bloat -- Basecamp does a few things, not a massive number. Although it has a limited amount of features, Basecamp comes with a sleek, easy-to-figure-out user interface designed for companies trying to entice external clients to use the system.

We've seen slicker, more capable calendar interfaces out there. But we can't seem to break our Google Calendar habit.

We doubt we're using it the way it's intended. We keep track of interesting events, even if we're not planning to attend, so that others can see them as well. It's easy to embed the calendar onto your personal Web page or invite a friend to an event, so you don't have to try to remember that there's a lecture at the local area two months after reading about it in a newsletter, one that you don't want to put in your PalmPilot yet because you're not sure you're going.

My features wish list would include natural language date entry -- 30boxes.com, among others, has that capability now -- as well as autocomplete from a list of prior "Where" entries. A little less structure might be nice as well, such as not requiring ending times (how do you know how long a concert will last?).

Still, after test-driving other online calendar services, we keep coming back to Google's as a reasonably easy, quick and functional interface.

What's great about Carbonite is how easy it is to back up files. Once you sign up, download the software and select what you want to backup, Carbonite did the rest. It automatically runs in the background, saving whatever files you've added or altered as long as they're in directories. The data is encrypted on Carbonite's servers, although you don't get my own private key.

What's less great is that the initial backup takes many days for a decent-size hard drive, even with a high-speed, fiber-optic Internet connection. And the only way to restore files is over the Internet in a process that can also take days; there's no option to pay for overnight delivery of data DVDs in an emergency. Still, at $50/year to back up one hard drive of unlimited size, Carbonite is affordable extra insurance in case of data disaster.

So, can Web apps replace the desktop?
We're not prepared to give up most of our desktop applications just yet. We'll need longer experience before we're convinced of availability and uptime, responsiveness and security. In some cases, we still want some way of working with our own data on our own system; in other cases (Excel), the Web apps don't yet match the power of the desktop.

But Web applications have come a long way in just a year or two. They'll no doubt become even more powerful in the coming months, and they'll be more enticing as alternatives to locally hosted software.

Source: Compiled from online sources.

Note: WorldLink has made every possible effort to ensure that the information contained in the article above is correct. However, we do not accept any responsibility whatsoever for any damage caused by the application of the information contained herein.

© 2006 WorldLink Communications Pvt. Ltd